Samuel Toro Ramirez vs Tiago Carvalho Mangialardo
1. 3-0 Thu 19. Feb 2026, 2026 · Result 0–1 · Alekhine Defense (B03).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Samuel Toro Ramirez vs Tiago Carvalho Mangialardo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Samuel Toro Ramirez (2089)
- Black
- Tiago Carvalho Mangialardo (1965)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 1. 3-0 Thu 19. Feb 2026
- Year
- 2026
- Opening
- Alekhine Defense (B03)
About this chess game
This chess game between Samuel Toro Ramirez (2089) and Tiago Carvalho Mangialardo (1965) was played at 1. 3-0 Thu 19. Feb 2026 in 2026 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Alekhine Defense (B03). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Samuel Toro Ramirez games or Tiago Carvalho Mangialardo games? This Samuel Toro Ramirez vs Tiago Carvalho Mangialardo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Alekhine Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Samuel Toro Ramirez vs Tiago Carvalho Mangialardo?
Samuel Toro Ramirez vs Tiago Carvalho Mangialardo (2026) finished 0–1, a win for Tiago Carvalho Mangialardo.
What opening was played in Samuel Toro Ramirez vs Tiago Carvalho Mangialardo?
The game opened with the Alekhine Defense (ECO B03).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Samuel Toro Ramirez vs Tiago Carvalho Mangialardo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.