Mohamed Tork vs abdullah Al-qudaimi
Golden Cleopatra Open, 2003 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (C57).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mohamed Tork vs abdullah Al-qudaimi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mohamed Tork (2139)
- Black
- abdullah Al-qudaimi (1249)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Golden Cleopatra Open
- Year
- 2003
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (C57)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mohamed Tork (2139) and abdullah Al-qudaimi (1249) was played at Golden Cleopatra Open in 2003 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (C57). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mohamed Tork games or abdullah Al-qudaimi games? This Mohamed Tork vs abdullah Al-qudaimi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mohamed Tork vs abdullah Al-qudaimi?
Mohamed Tork vs abdullah Al-qudaimi (2003) finished 1–0, a win for Mohamed Tork.
What opening was played in Mohamed Tork vs abdullah Al-qudaimi?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (ECO C57).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mohamed Tork vs abdullah Al-qudaimi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.