Matthias Tonndorf vs Sebastian Plischki
2016 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation (B93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Matthias Tonndorf vs Sebastian Plischki with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Matthias Tonndorf (2260)
- Black
- Sebastian Plischki (2377)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation (B93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Matthias Tonndorf (2260) and Sebastian Plischki (2377) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation (B93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Matthias Tonndorf games or Sebastian Plischki games? This Matthias Tonndorf vs Sebastian Plischki encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Matthias Tonndorf vs Sebastian Plischki?
Matthias Tonndorf vs Sebastian Plischki (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Matthias Tonndorf vs Sebastian Plischki?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation (ECO B93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Matthias Tonndorf vs Sebastian Plischki, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.