Evgeny Tomashevsky vs Ivan Saric
18. ch-EUR Indiv 2017, 2017 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Evgeny Tomashevsky vs Ivan Saric with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Evgeny Tomashevsky (2706)
- Black
- Ivan Saric (2616)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 18. ch-EUR Indiv 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Evgeny Tomashevsky (2706) and Ivan Saric (2616) was played at 18. ch-EUR Indiv 2017 in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Evgeny Tomashevsky games or Ivan Saric games? This Evgeny Tomashevsky vs Ivan Saric encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Evgeny Tomashevsky vs Ivan Saric?
Evgeny Tomashevsky vs Ivan Saric (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Evgeny Tomashevsky vs Ivan Saric?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (ECO E90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Evgeny Tomashevsky vs Ivan Saric, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.