Izabela Tokarz vs Wiktoria Sivickis
TCh-POL 2. League 2022, 2022 · Result 1–0 · Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Izabela Tokarz vs Wiktoria Sivickis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Izabela Tokarz (1821)
- Black
- Wiktoria Sivickis (1723)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- TCh-POL 2. League 2022
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Izabela Tokarz (1821) and Wiktoria Sivickis (1723) was played at TCh-POL 2. League 2022 in 2022 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Izabela Tokarz games or Wiktoria Sivickis games? This Izabela Tokarz vs Wiktoria Sivickis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Izabela Tokarz vs Wiktoria Sivickis?
Izabela Tokarz vs Wiktoria Sivickis (2022) finished 1–0, a win for Izabela Tokarz.
What opening was played in Izabela Tokarz vs Wiktoria Sivickis?
The game opened with the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (ECO A58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Izabela Tokarz vs Wiktoria Sivickis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.