Tomasz Tlok vs Jeremi Wesolowski
Adolf Anderssen Mem 2025, 2025 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tomasz Tlok vs Jeremi Wesolowski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tomasz Tlok
- Black
- Jeremi Wesolowski (1797)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Adolf Anderssen Mem 2025
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tomasz Tlok and Jeremi Wesolowski (1797) was played at Adolf Anderssen Mem 2025 in 2025 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tomasz Tlok games or Jeremi Wesolowski games? This Tomasz Tlok vs Jeremi Wesolowski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tomasz Tlok vs Jeremi Wesolowski?
Tomasz Tlok vs Jeremi Wesolowski (2025) finished 0–1, a win for Jeremi Wesolowski.
What opening was played in Tomasz Tlok vs Jeremi Wesolowski?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (ECO B45).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tomasz Tlok vs Jeremi Wesolowski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.