David Tkalecz Delgado vs Dmitrij Krivosheya
OP-01109, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Tkalecz Delgado vs Dmitrij Krivosheya with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Tkalecz Delgado (1924)
- Black
- Dmitrij Krivosheya (1386)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- OP-01109
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Tkalecz Delgado (1924) and Dmitrij Krivosheya (1386) was played at OP-01109 in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Tkalecz Delgado games or Dmitrij Krivosheya games? This David Tkalecz Delgado vs Dmitrij Krivosheya encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Tkalecz Delgado vs Dmitrij Krivosheya?
David Tkalecz Delgado vs Dmitrij Krivosheya (2010) finished 1–0, a win for David Tkalecz Delgado.
What opening was played in David Tkalecz Delgado vs Dmitrij Krivosheya?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Tkalecz Delgado vs Dmitrij Krivosheya, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.