Andres Camilo Tique vs Efrain Steven Arismendi Polanco
3. Ortega Rating, 2013 · Result 0–1 · Amar Opening (A00).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Andres Camilo Tique vs Efrain Steven Arismendi Polanco with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Andres Camilo Tique
- Black
- Efrain Steven Arismendi Polanco (1804)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 3. Ortega Rating
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Amar Opening (A00)
About this chess game
This chess game between Andres Camilo Tique and Efrain Steven Arismendi Polanco (1804) was played at 3. Ortega Rating in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Amar Opening (A00). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Andres Camilo Tique games or Efrain Steven Arismendi Polanco games? This Andres Camilo Tique vs Efrain Steven Arismendi Polanco encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Amar Opening.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Andres Camilo Tique vs Efrain Steven Arismendi Polanco?
Andres Camilo Tique vs Efrain Steven Arismendi Polanco (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Efrain Steven Arismendi Polanco.
What opening was played in Andres Camilo Tique vs Efrain Steven Arismendi Polanco?
The game opened with the Amar Opening (ECO A00).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Andres Camilo Tique vs Efrain Steven Arismendi Polanco, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.