Richard Tillett vs Phillip J Beckett
BCCA/2015/ResD (ENG), 2015 · Result 1–0 · Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation (C77).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Richard Tillett vs Phillip J Beckett with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Richard Tillett (2038)
- Black
- Phillip J Beckett (1960)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- BCCA/2015/ResD (ENG)
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation (C77)
About this chess game
This chess game between Richard Tillett (2038) and Phillip J Beckett (1960) was played at BCCA/2015/ResD (ENG) in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation (C77). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Richard Tillett games or Phillip J Beckett games? This Richard Tillett vs Phillip J Beckett encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Richard Tillett vs Phillip J Beckett?
Richard Tillett vs Phillip J Beckett (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Richard Tillett.
What opening was played in Richard Tillett vs Phillip J Beckett?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation (ECO C77).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Richard Tillett vs Phillip J Beckett, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.