Klaus, Dr. Tiemer vs Mathias Wuersig
2009 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (E73).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Klaus, Dr. Tiemer vs Mathias Wuersig with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Klaus, Dr. Tiemer (1958)
- Black
- Mathias Wuersig (1868)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (E73)
About this chess game
This chess game between Klaus, Dr. Tiemer (1958) and Mathias Wuersig (1868) was played in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (E73). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Klaus, Dr. Tiemer games or Mathias Wuersig games? This Klaus, Dr. Tiemer vs Mathias Wuersig encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Klaus, Dr. Tiemer vs Mathias Wuersig?
Klaus, Dr. Tiemer vs Mathias Wuersig (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Klaus, Dr. Tiemer.
What opening was played in Klaus, Dr. Tiemer vs Mathias Wuersig?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (ECO E73).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Klaus, Dr. Tiemer vs Mathias Wuersig, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.