Robert Tibensky vs Morten Peter David
Czech Extra League 2000-1, 2001 · Result 1–0 · Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation (D77).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Robert Tibensky vs Morten Peter David with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Robert Tibensky (2441)
- Black
- Morten Peter David (2436)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Czech Extra League 2000-1
- Year
- 2001
- Opening
- Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation (D77)
About this chess game
This chess game between Robert Tibensky (2441) and Morten Peter David (2436) was played at Czech Extra League 2000-1 in 2001 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation (D77). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Robert Tibensky games or Morten Peter David games? This Robert Tibensky vs Morten Peter David encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Robert Tibensky vs Morten Peter David?
Robert Tibensky vs Morten Peter David (2001) finished 1–0, a win for Robert Tibensky.
What opening was played in Robert Tibensky vs Morten Peter David?
The game opened with the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation (ECO D77).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Robert Tibensky vs Morten Peter David, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.