Edward Thompson vs Sören Lövkvist
SWE-CAN 2022, 2022 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Edward Thompson vs Sören Lövkvist with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Edward Thompson (1948)
- Black
- Sören Lövkvist (2068)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- SWE-CAN 2022
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39)
About this chess game
This chess game between Edward Thompson (1948) and Sören Lövkvist (2068) was played at SWE-CAN 2022 in 2022 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Edward Thompson games or Sören Lövkvist games? This Edward Thompson vs Sören Lövkvist encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Edward Thompson vs Sören Lövkvist?
Edward Thompson vs Sören Lövkvist (2022) finished 0–1, a win for Sören Lövkvist.
What opening was played in Edward Thompson vs Sören Lövkvist?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (ECO A39).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Edward Thompson vs Sören Lövkvist, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.