Rasmus Thogersen vs Per-Henrik Axel Nielsen
Politiken Cup 2012, 2012 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Paulsen Variation (C10).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rasmus Thogersen vs Per-Henrik Axel Nielsen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rasmus Thogersen (1904)
- Black
- Per-Henrik Axel Nielsen (1999)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Politiken Cup 2012
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- French Defense: Paulsen Variation (C10)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rasmus Thogersen (1904) and Per-Henrik Axel Nielsen (1999) was played at Politiken Cup 2012 in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Paulsen Variation (C10). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rasmus Thogersen games or Per-Henrik Axel Nielsen games? This Rasmus Thogersen vs Per-Henrik Axel Nielsen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Paulsen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rasmus Thogersen vs Per-Henrik Axel Nielsen?
Rasmus Thogersen vs Per-Henrik Axel Nielsen (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Rasmus Thogersen.
What opening was played in Rasmus Thogersen vs Per-Henrik Axel Nielsen?
The game opened with the French Defense: Paulsen Variation (ECO C10).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rasmus Thogersen vs Per-Henrik Axel Nielsen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.