Nika Testova vs Polina Gutkovich
2017 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nika Testova vs Polina Gutkovich with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nika Testova (1664)
- Black
- Polina Gutkovich (1904)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nika Testova (1664) and Polina Gutkovich (1904) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nika Testova games or Polina Gutkovich games? This Nika Testova vs Polina Gutkovich encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nika Testova vs Polina Gutkovich?
Nika Testova vs Polina Gutkovich (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Nika Testova vs Polina Gutkovich?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (ECO B31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nika Testova vs Polina Gutkovich, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.