Ricardo Yoshida Teshima vs Rodrigo Machado Mendes
2017 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation (C03).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ricardo Yoshida Teshima vs Rodrigo Machado Mendes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ricardo Yoshida Teshima (1777)
- Black
- Rodrigo Machado Mendes (1997)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation (C03)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ricardo Yoshida Teshima (1777) and Rodrigo Machado Mendes (1997) was played in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation (C03). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ricardo Yoshida Teshima games or Rodrigo Machado Mendes games? This Ricardo Yoshida Teshima vs Rodrigo Machado Mendes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ricardo Yoshida Teshima vs Rodrigo Machado Mendes?
Ricardo Yoshida Teshima vs Rodrigo Machado Mendes (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Rodrigo Machado Mendes.
What opening was played in Ricardo Yoshida Teshima vs Rodrigo Machado Mendes?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation (ECO C03).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ricardo Yoshida Teshima vs Rodrigo Machado Mendes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.