Bruno Terkiewicz vs Wiktor Matyszkiewicz
266. YMCA Autumn A 2022, 2022 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Bruno Terkiewicz vs Wiktor Matyszkiewicz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bruno Terkiewicz (1846)
- Black
- Wiktor Matyszkiewicz (1793)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 266. YMCA Autumn A 2022
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bruno Terkiewicz (1846) and Wiktor Matyszkiewicz (1793) was played at 266. YMCA Autumn A 2022 in 2022 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bruno Terkiewicz games or Wiktor Matyszkiewicz games? This Bruno Terkiewicz vs Wiktor Matyszkiewicz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bruno Terkiewicz vs Wiktor Matyszkiewicz?
Bruno Terkiewicz vs Wiktor Matyszkiewicz (2022) finished 1–0, a win for Bruno Terkiewicz.
What opening was played in Bruno Terkiewicz vs Wiktor Matyszkiewicz?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bruno Terkiewicz vs Wiktor Matyszkiewicz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.