Luis Teran Pereda vs Dan Rucsandescu
2012 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation (D69).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luis Teran Pereda vs Dan Rucsandescu with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luis Teran Pereda (1838)
- Black
- Dan Rucsandescu (1945)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation (D69)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luis Teran Pereda (1838) and Dan Rucsandescu (1945) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation (D69). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luis Teran Pereda games or Dan Rucsandescu games? This Luis Teran Pereda vs Dan Rucsandescu encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luis Teran Pereda vs Dan Rucsandescu?
Luis Teran Pereda vs Dan Rucsandescu (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Luis Teran Pereda vs Dan Rucsandescu?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation (ECO D69).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luis Teran Pereda vs Dan Rucsandescu, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.