Euclides Teixeira vs Sophia Lorena Rodrigues Mota
2018 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (B50).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Euclides Teixeira vs Sophia Lorena Rodrigues Mota with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Euclides Teixeira (1983)
- Black
- Sophia Lorena Rodrigues Mota (1642)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (B50)
About this chess game
This chess game between Euclides Teixeira (1983) and Sophia Lorena Rodrigues Mota (1642) was played in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (B50). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Euclides Teixeira games or Sophia Lorena Rodrigues Mota games? This Euclides Teixeira vs Sophia Lorena Rodrigues Mota encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Euclides Teixeira vs Sophia Lorena Rodrigues Mota?
Euclides Teixeira vs Sophia Lorena Rodrigues Mota (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Euclides Teixeira.
What opening was played in Euclides Teixeira vs Sophia Lorena Rodrigues Mota?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (ECO B50).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Euclides Teixeira vs Sophia Lorena Rodrigues Mota, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.