Adam A Taylor vs Rudy Van Kemenade
4NCL Division 3s, 2015 · Result 0–1 · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Adam A Taylor vs Rudy Van Kemenade with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Adam A Taylor (2098)
- Black
- Rudy Van Kemenade (1965)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 4NCL Division 3s
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88)
About this chess game
This chess game between Adam A Taylor (2098) and Rudy Van Kemenade (1965) was played at 4NCL Division 3s in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Adam A Taylor games or Rudy Van Kemenade games? This Adam A Taylor vs Rudy Van Kemenade encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Adam A Taylor vs Rudy Van Kemenade?
Adam A Taylor vs Rudy Van Kemenade (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Rudy Van Kemenade.
What opening was played in Adam A Taylor vs Rudy Van Kemenade?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (ECO A88).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Adam A Taylor vs Rudy Van Kemenade, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.