Adam C Taylor vs Rohan Shiatis
EY Boys U14 2012, 2012 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (E73).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Adam C Taylor vs Rohan Shiatis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Adam C Taylor (1946)
- Black
- Rohan Shiatis (1987)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- EY Boys U14 2012
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (E73)
About this chess game
This chess game between Adam C Taylor (1946) and Rohan Shiatis (1987) was played at EY Boys U14 2012 in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (E73). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Adam C Taylor games or Rohan Shiatis games? This Adam C Taylor vs Rohan Shiatis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Adam C Taylor vs Rohan Shiatis?
Adam C Taylor vs Rohan Shiatis (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Adam C Taylor vs Rohan Shiatis?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (ECO E73).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Adam C Taylor vs Rohan Shiatis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.