Bob Taylor vs Boris Nikolaevich Kovernikov
VWC2/pr12, 2009 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Bob Taylor vs Boris Nikolaevich Kovernikov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bob Taylor (1952)
- Black
- Boris Nikolaevich Kovernikov (2331)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- VWC2/pr12
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bob Taylor (1952) and Boris Nikolaevich Kovernikov (2331) was played at VWC2/pr12 in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bob Taylor games or Boris Nikolaevich Kovernikov games? This Bob Taylor vs Boris Nikolaevich Kovernikov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bob Taylor vs Boris Nikolaevich Kovernikov?
Bob Taylor vs Boris Nikolaevich Kovernikov (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Boris Nikolaevich Kovernikov.
What opening was played in Bob Taylor vs Boris Nikolaevich Kovernikov?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (ECO A30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bob Taylor vs Boris Nikolaevich Kovernikov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.