Fadil Tascier vs Mariusz Maciej Broniek
5. LSS Anni P-00004, 2011 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation (E30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fadil Tascier vs Mariusz Maciej Broniek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fadil Tascier (1308)
- Black
- Mariusz Maciej Broniek (2418)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 5. LSS Anni P-00004
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation (E30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fadil Tascier (1308) and Mariusz Maciej Broniek (2418) was played at 5. LSS Anni P-00004 in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation (E30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fadil Tascier games or Mariusz Maciej Broniek games? This Fadil Tascier vs Mariusz Maciej Broniek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fadil Tascier vs Mariusz Maciej Broniek?
Fadil Tascier vs Mariusz Maciej Broniek (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Fadil Tascier.
What opening was played in Fadil Tascier vs Mariusz Maciej Broniek?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation (ECO E30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fadil Tascier vs Mariusz Maciej Broniek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.