Narcis Tarrus Galter vs Jorge Hueso Moliner
2017 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Narcis Tarrus Galter vs Jorge Hueso Moliner with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Narcis Tarrus Galter (1891)
- Black
- Jorge Hueso Moliner (2120)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Narcis Tarrus Galter (1891) and Jorge Hueso Moliner (2120) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Narcis Tarrus Galter games or Jorge Hueso Moliner games? This Narcis Tarrus Galter vs Jorge Hueso Moliner encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Narcis Tarrus Galter vs Jorge Hueso Moliner?
Narcis Tarrus Galter vs Jorge Hueso Moliner (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Narcis Tarrus Galter vs Jorge Hueso Moliner?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Narcis Tarrus Galter vs Jorge Hueso Moliner, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.