Miguel Tarrago Domingo vs Armando Daguro Dasalla
2009 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Miguel Tarrago Domingo vs Armando Daguro Dasalla with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Miguel Tarrago Domingo (2066)
- Black
- Armando Daguro Dasalla (2077)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Miguel Tarrago Domingo (2066) and Armando Daguro Dasalla (2077) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Miguel Tarrago Domingo games or Armando Daguro Dasalla games? This Miguel Tarrago Domingo vs Armando Daguro Dasalla encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Miguel Tarrago Domingo vs Armando Daguro Dasalla?
Miguel Tarrago Domingo vs Armando Daguro Dasalla (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Miguel Tarrago Domingo vs Armando Daguro Dasalla?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Miguel Tarrago Domingo vs Armando Daguro Dasalla, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.