Thomas Tarrach vs Nils Patrick Heidenreich
Duisburg Grossenbaum Open, 2005 · Result 0–1 · Indian Defense: Budapest Defense (A52).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Thomas Tarrach vs Nils Patrick Heidenreich with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Thomas Tarrach
- Black
- Nils Patrick Heidenreich (2004)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Duisburg Grossenbaum Open
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Indian Defense: Budapest Defense (A52)
About this chess game
This chess game between Thomas Tarrach and Nils Patrick Heidenreich (2004) was played at Duisburg Grossenbaum Open in 2005 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Indian Defense: Budapest Defense (A52). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Thomas Tarrach games or Nils Patrick Heidenreich games? This Thomas Tarrach vs Nils Patrick Heidenreich encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Indian Defense: Budapest Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Thomas Tarrach vs Nils Patrick Heidenreich?
Thomas Tarrach vs Nils Patrick Heidenreich (2005) finished 0–1, a win for Nils Patrick Heidenreich.
What opening was played in Thomas Tarrach vs Nils Patrick Heidenreich?
The game opened with the Indian Defense: Budapest Defense (ECO A52).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Thomas Tarrach vs Nils Patrick Heidenreich, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.