Konstantin Tarlev vs Gennadi Ginsburg
2016 · Result 1–0 · Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Konstantin Tarlev vs Gennadi Ginsburg with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Konstantin Tarlev (2581)
- Black
- Gennadi Ginsburg (2469)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Konstantin Tarlev (2581) and Gennadi Ginsburg (2469) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Konstantin Tarlev games or Gennadi Ginsburg games? This Konstantin Tarlev vs Gennadi Ginsburg encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Konstantin Tarlev vs Gennadi Ginsburg?
Konstantin Tarlev vs Gennadi Ginsburg (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Konstantin Tarlev.
What opening was played in Konstantin Tarlev vs Gennadi Ginsburg?
The game opened with the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO D34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Konstantin Tarlev vs Gennadi Ginsburg, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.