Joseph G Tanti vs Owen M. Pritchard
AUS-NZL 2016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Joseph G Tanti vs Owen M. Pritchard with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Joseph G Tanti (1853)
- Black
- Owen M. Pritchard (2128)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- AUS-NZL 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Joseph G Tanti (1853) and Owen M. Pritchard (2128) was played at AUS-NZL 2016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Joseph G Tanti games or Owen M. Pritchard games? This Joseph G Tanti vs Owen M. Pritchard encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Joseph G Tanti vs Owen M. Pritchard?
Joseph G Tanti vs Owen M. Pritchard (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Joseph G Tanti.
What opening was played in Joseph G Tanti vs Owen M. Pritchard?
The game opened with the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (ECO C13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Joseph G Tanti vs Owen M. Pritchard, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.