Toleafoa Edward Tanoi vs Roy Seabrook
Queenstown Classic, 2009 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (E15).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Toleafoa Edward Tanoi vs Roy Seabrook with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Toleafoa Edward Tanoi (1956)
- Black
- Roy Seabrook (1845)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Queenstown Classic
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (E15)
About this chess game
This chess game between Toleafoa Edward Tanoi (1956) and Roy Seabrook (1845) was played at Queenstown Classic in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (E15). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Toleafoa Edward Tanoi games or Roy Seabrook games? This Toleafoa Edward Tanoi vs Roy Seabrook encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Toleafoa Edward Tanoi vs Roy Seabrook?
Toleafoa Edward Tanoi vs Roy Seabrook (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Toleafoa Edward Tanoi.
What opening was played in Toleafoa Edward Tanoi vs Roy Seabrook?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (ECO E15).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Toleafoa Edward Tanoi vs Roy Seabrook, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.