Luiz Tannus vs Karl Lehnberger
CP.2001.Q.00002, 2002 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System, Rubinstein Variation (E42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luiz Tannus vs Karl Lehnberger with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luiz Tannus (2035)
- Black
- Karl Lehnberger (1722)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CP.2001.Q.00002
- Year
- 2002
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System, Rubinstein Variation (E42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luiz Tannus (2035) and Karl Lehnberger (1722) was played at CP.2001.Q.00002 in 2002 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System, Rubinstein Variation (E42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luiz Tannus games or Karl Lehnberger games? This Luiz Tannus vs Karl Lehnberger encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System, Rubinstein Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luiz Tannus vs Karl Lehnberger?
Luiz Tannus vs Karl Lehnberger (2002) finished 0–1, a win for Karl Lehnberger.
What opening was played in Luiz Tannus vs Karl Lehnberger?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System, Rubinstein Variation (ECO E42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luiz Tannus vs Karl Lehnberger, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.