Jonathan Tan vs Paul Ten Vergert
2007 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jonathan Tan vs Paul Ten Vergert with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jonathan Tan (1749)
- Black
- Paul Ten Vergert (1901)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jonathan Tan (1749) and Paul Ten Vergert (1901) was played in 2007 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jonathan Tan games or Paul Ten Vergert games? This Jonathan Tan vs Paul Ten Vergert encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jonathan Tan vs Paul Ten Vergert?
Jonathan Tan vs Paul Ten Vergert (2007) finished 1–0, a win for Jonathan Tan.
What opening was played in Jonathan Tan vs Paul Ten Vergert?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (ECO B31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jonathan Tan vs Paul Ten Vergert, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.