Isabelle Tamarozi vs Douglas Rodrigo Jenidarchiche
2016 · Result 1–0 · Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Isabelle Tamarozi vs Douglas Rodrigo Jenidarchiche with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Isabelle Tamarozi (2037)
- Black
- Douglas Rodrigo Jenidarchiche (1792)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Isabelle Tamarozi (2037) and Douglas Rodrigo Jenidarchiche (1792) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Isabelle Tamarozi games or Douglas Rodrigo Jenidarchiche games? This Isabelle Tamarozi vs Douglas Rodrigo Jenidarchiche encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Isabelle Tamarozi vs Douglas Rodrigo Jenidarchiche?
Isabelle Tamarozi vs Douglas Rodrigo Jenidarchiche (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Isabelle Tamarozi.
What opening was played in Isabelle Tamarozi vs Douglas Rodrigo Jenidarchiche?
The game opened with the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Isabelle Tamarozi vs Douglas Rodrigo Jenidarchiche, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.