Pablo Ivan Tachella vs Martin Gimenez
2011 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pablo Ivan Tachella vs Martin Gimenez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pablo Ivan Tachella (1834)
- Black
- Martin Gimenez (2040)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pablo Ivan Tachella (1834) and Martin Gimenez (2040) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pablo Ivan Tachella games or Martin Gimenez games? This Pablo Ivan Tachella vs Martin Gimenez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pablo Ivan Tachella vs Martin Gimenez?
Pablo Ivan Tachella vs Martin Gimenez (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Pablo Ivan Tachella vs Martin Gimenez?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (ECO E63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pablo Ivan Tachella vs Martin Gimenez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.