Lucas Tacconi da Silva vs Jacson Henrique Gatelli
2015 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A96).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lucas Tacconi da Silva vs Jacson Henrique Gatelli with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lucas Tacconi da Silva (1983)
- Black
- Jacson Henrique Gatelli (1920)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A96)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lucas Tacconi da Silva (1983) and Jacson Henrique Gatelli (1920) was played in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A96). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lucas Tacconi da Silva games or Jacson Henrique Gatelli games? This Lucas Tacconi da Silva vs Jacson Henrique Gatelli encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lucas Tacconi da Silva vs Jacson Henrique Gatelli?
Lucas Tacconi da Silva vs Jacson Henrique Gatelli (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Lucas Tacconi da Silva.
What opening was played in Lucas Tacconi da Silva vs Jacson Henrique Gatelli?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (ECO A96).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lucas Tacconi da Silva vs Jacson Henrique Gatelli, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.