Daniel Taboas Rodriguez vs Jose Vilarnovo Caamano
Leganes, 1. Gonzalez Memorial, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense (A80).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel Taboas Rodriguez vs Jose Vilarnovo Caamano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel Taboas Rodriguez (2381)
- Black
- Jose Vilarnovo Caamano (2059)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Leganes, 1. Gonzalez Memorial
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Dutch Defense (A80)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel Taboas Rodriguez (2381) and Jose Vilarnovo Caamano (2059) was played at Leganes, 1. Gonzalez Memorial in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense (A80). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel Taboas Rodriguez games or Jose Vilarnovo Caamano games? This Daniel Taboas Rodriguez vs Jose Vilarnovo Caamano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel Taboas Rodriguez vs Jose Vilarnovo Caamano?
Daniel Taboas Rodriguez vs Jose Vilarnovo Caamano (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Daniel Taboas Rodriguez.
What opening was played in Daniel Taboas Rodriguez vs Jose Vilarnovo Caamano?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense (ECO A80).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel Taboas Rodriguez vs Jose Vilarnovo Caamano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.