M. Amin Tabatabaei vs Abazar Gholami
IRI Ch SF 2016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay M. Amin Tabatabaei vs Abazar Gholami with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- M. Amin Tabatabaei (2485)
- Black
- Abazar Gholami (2426)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- IRI Ch SF 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42)
About this chess game
This chess game between M. Amin Tabatabaei (2485) and Abazar Gholami (2426) was played at IRI Ch SF 2016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more M. Amin Tabatabaei games or Abazar Gholami games? This M. Amin Tabatabaei vs Abazar Gholami encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won M. Amin Tabatabaei vs Abazar Gholami?
M. Amin Tabatabaei vs Abazar Gholami (2016) finished 1–0, a win for M. Amin Tabatabaei.
What opening was played in M. Amin Tabatabaei vs Abazar Gholami?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (ECO B42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of M. Amin Tabatabaei vs Abazar Gholami, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.