Robert Szymanski vs Peter Jugl
Capablanca Open Gr. 4, 2021 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense, Vienna Variation (D39).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Robert Szymanski vs Peter Jugl with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Robert Szymanski (1620)
- Black
- Peter Jugl (2367)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Capablanca Open Gr. 4
- Year
- 2021
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense, Vienna Variation (D39)
About this chess game
This chess game between Robert Szymanski (1620) and Peter Jugl (2367) was played at Capablanca Open Gr. 4 in 2021 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense, Vienna Variation (D39). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Robert Szymanski games or Peter Jugl games? This Robert Szymanski vs Peter Jugl encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense, Vienna Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Robert Szymanski vs Peter Jugl?
Robert Szymanski vs Peter Jugl (2021) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Robert Szymanski vs Peter Jugl?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense, Vienna Variation (ECO D39).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Robert Szymanski vs Peter Jugl, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.