Antoni Szustakowski vs Stanislaw Zylka
2017 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (D19).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Antoni Szustakowski vs Stanislaw Zylka with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antoni Szustakowski (2171)
- Black
- Stanislaw Zylka (2368)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (D19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antoni Szustakowski (2171) and Stanislaw Zylka (2368) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (D19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antoni Szustakowski games or Stanislaw Zylka games? This Antoni Szustakowski vs Stanislaw Zylka encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antoni Szustakowski vs Stanislaw Zylka?
Antoni Szustakowski vs Stanislaw Zylka (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Antoni Szustakowski vs Stanislaw Zylka?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (ECO D19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antoni Szustakowski vs Stanislaw Zylka, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.