Antoni Szukalski vs Jan Kaminski
2016 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Antoni Szukalski vs Jan Kaminski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antoni Szukalski (1741)
- Black
- Jan Kaminski (1882)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antoni Szukalski (1741) and Jan Kaminski (1882) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antoni Szukalski games or Jan Kaminski games? This Antoni Szukalski vs Jan Kaminski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antoni Szukalski vs Jan Kaminski?
Antoni Szukalski vs Jan Kaminski (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Jan Kaminski.
What opening was played in Antoni Szukalski vs Jan Kaminski?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (ECO B31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antoni Szukalski vs Jan Kaminski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.