Bernardo Vainzoff Sztokbant vs Yago Labussiere
2019 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Boleslavsky Variation (B59).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Bernardo Vainzoff Sztokbant vs Yago Labussiere with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bernardo Vainzoff Sztokbant (2149)
- Black
- Yago Labussiere (2082)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Boleslavsky Variation (B59)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bernardo Vainzoff Sztokbant (2149) and Yago Labussiere (2082) was played in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Boleslavsky Variation (B59). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bernardo Vainzoff Sztokbant games or Yago Labussiere games? This Bernardo Vainzoff Sztokbant vs Yago Labussiere encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Boleslavsky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bernardo Vainzoff Sztokbant vs Yago Labussiere?
Bernardo Vainzoff Sztokbant vs Yago Labussiere (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Bernardo Vainzoff Sztokbant.
What opening was played in Bernardo Vainzoff Sztokbant vs Yago Labussiere?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Boleslavsky Variation (ECO B59).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bernardo Vainzoff Sztokbant vs Yago Labussiere, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.