Janusz Szopa vs Antonio Juárez de Vena
NBC/D (NED), 2021 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Janusz Szopa vs Antonio Juárez de Vena with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Janusz Szopa (2009)
- Black
- Antonio Juárez de Vena (1835)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- NBC/D (NED)
- Year
- 2021
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Janusz Szopa (2009) and Antonio Juárez de Vena (1835) was played at NBC/D (NED) in 2021 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Janusz Szopa games or Antonio Juárez de Vena games? This Janusz Szopa vs Antonio Juárez de Vena encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Janusz Szopa vs Antonio Juárez de Vena?
Janusz Szopa vs Antonio Juárez de Vena (2021) finished 1–0, a win for Janusz Szopa.
What opening was played in Janusz Szopa vs Antonio Juárez de Vena?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Janusz Szopa vs Antonio Juárez de Vena, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.