Maciej Szalko vs Ivane Siprashvili
2019 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Maciej Szalko vs Ivane Siprashvili with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maciej Szalko (1889)
- Black
- Ivane Siprashvili (2074)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maciej Szalko (1889) and Ivane Siprashvili (2074) was played in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maciej Szalko games or Ivane Siprashvili games? This Maciej Szalko vs Ivane Siprashvili encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maciej Szalko vs Ivane Siprashvili?
Maciej Szalko vs Ivane Siprashvili (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Ivane Siprashvili.
What opening was played in Maciej Szalko vs Ivane Siprashvili?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (ECO E67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maciej Szalko vs Ivane Siprashvili, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.