Robin Swinkels vs Roland Robinson
Helmond Open, 2003 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense, Main Line (D42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Robin Swinkels vs Roland Robinson with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Robin Swinkels (2171)
- Black
- Roland Robinson (1719)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Helmond Open
- Year
- 2003
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense, Main Line (D42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Robin Swinkels (2171) and Roland Robinson (1719) was played at Helmond Open in 2003 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense, Main Line (D42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Robin Swinkels games or Roland Robinson games? This Robin Swinkels vs Roland Robinson encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Robin Swinkels vs Roland Robinson?
Robin Swinkels vs Roland Robinson (2003) finished 1–0, a win for Robin Swinkels.
What opening was played in Robin Swinkels vs Roland Robinson?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense, Main Line (ECO D42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Robin Swinkels vs Roland Robinson, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.