Mishra Swayams vs Sundar M. Shyam
Puri IND,40. National Junior Ch (U19), 2010 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation (E71).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mishra Swayams vs Sundar M. Shyam with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mishra Swayams (2377)
- Black
- Sundar M. Shyam (2417)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Puri IND,40. National Junior Ch (U19)
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation (E71)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mishra Swayams (2377) and Sundar M. Shyam (2417) was played at Puri IND,40. National Junior Ch (U19) in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation (E71). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mishra Swayams games or Sundar M. Shyam games? This Mishra Swayams vs Sundar M. Shyam encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mishra Swayams vs Sundar M. Shyam?
Mishra Swayams vs Sundar M. Shyam (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Mishra Swayams.
What opening was played in Mishra Swayams vs Sundar M. Shyam?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation (ECO E71).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mishra Swayams vs Sundar M. Shyam, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.