Mishra Swayams vs Rajib Dhar
50. ch-IND Challengers 2012, 2012 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense, Russian Variation (D56).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mishra Swayams vs Rajib Dhar with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mishra Swayams (2400)
- Black
- Rajib Dhar (2207)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 50. ch-IND Challengers 2012
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense, Russian Variation (D56)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mishra Swayams (2400) and Rajib Dhar (2207) was played at 50. ch-IND Challengers 2012 in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense, Russian Variation (D56). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mishra Swayams games or Rajib Dhar games? This Mishra Swayams vs Rajib Dhar encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense, Russian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mishra Swayams vs Rajib Dhar?
Mishra Swayams vs Rajib Dhar (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Mishra Swayams.
What opening was played in Mishra Swayams vs Rajib Dhar?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense, Russian Variation (ECO D56).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mishra Swayams vs Rajib Dhar, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.