Rostislav Svoboda vs Martin Adamcik
2006 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rostislav Svoboda vs Martin Adamcik with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rostislav Svoboda (2028)
- Black
- Martin Adamcik (2170)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rostislav Svoboda (2028) and Martin Adamcik (2170) was played in 2006 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rostislav Svoboda games or Martin Adamcik games? This Rostislav Svoboda vs Martin Adamcik encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rostislav Svoboda vs Martin Adamcik?
Rostislav Svoboda vs Martin Adamcik (2006) finished 1–0, a win for Rostislav Svoboda.
What opening was played in Rostislav Svoboda vs Martin Adamcik?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (ECO E65).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rostislav Svoboda vs Martin Adamcik, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.