Soren Svensson vs Johan 2011 Henriksson
Elite Hotels Vaxjo Open, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Soren Svensson vs Johan 2011 Henriksson with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Soren Svensson (1964)
- Black
- Johan 2011 Henriksson (2252)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Elite Hotels Vaxjo Open
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15)
About this chess game
This chess game between Soren Svensson (1964) and Johan 2011 Henriksson (2252) was played at Elite Hotels Vaxjo Open in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Soren Svensson games or Johan 2011 Henriksson games? This Soren Svensson vs Johan 2011 Henriksson encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Soren Svensson vs Johan 2011 Henriksson?
Soren Svensson vs Johan 2011 Henriksson (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Johan 2011 Henriksson.
What opening was played in Soren Svensson vs Johan 2011 Henriksson?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO D15).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Soren Svensson vs Johan 2011 Henriksson, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.