Peter Willer Svendsen vs Johnny Holler Johansen
2019 · Result 0–1 · Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter Willer Svendsen vs Johnny Holler Johansen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter Willer Svendsen (1936)
- Black
- Johnny Holler Johansen (1932)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter Willer Svendsen (1936) and Johnny Holler Johansen (1932) was played in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter Willer Svendsen games or Johnny Holler Johansen games? This Peter Willer Svendsen vs Johnny Holler Johansen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter Willer Svendsen vs Johnny Holler Johansen?
Peter Willer Svendsen vs Johnny Holler Johansen (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Johnny Holler Johansen.
What opening was played in Peter Willer Svendsen vs Johnny Holler Johansen?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter Willer Svendsen vs Johnny Holler Johansen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.