Alexander Suvorov vs Daniel Sulayev
2017 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (E62).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexander Suvorov vs Daniel Sulayev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexander Suvorov (2196)
- Black
- Daniel Sulayev (1961)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (E62)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexander Suvorov (2196) and Daniel Sulayev (1961) was played in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (E62). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexander Suvorov games or Daniel Sulayev games? This Alexander Suvorov vs Daniel Sulayev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexander Suvorov vs Daniel Sulayev?
Alexander Suvorov vs Daniel Sulayev (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Alexander Suvorov.
What opening was played in Alexander Suvorov vs Daniel Sulayev?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (ECO E62).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexander Suvorov vs Daniel Sulayev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.