Jaime Sunye Neto vs Adam Kuligowski
Brussels, 1986 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line (D29).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jaime Sunye Neto vs Adam Kuligowski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jaime Sunye Neto (2480)
- Black
- Adam Kuligowski (2390)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Brussels
- Year
- 1986
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line (D29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jaime Sunye Neto (2480) and Adam Kuligowski (2390) was played at Brussels in 1986 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line (D29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jaime Sunye Neto games or Adam Kuligowski games? This Jaime Sunye Neto vs Adam Kuligowski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jaime Sunye Neto vs Adam Kuligowski?
Jaime Sunye Neto vs Adam Kuligowski (1986) finished 0–1, a win for Adam Kuligowski.
What opening was played in Jaime Sunye Neto vs Adam Kuligowski?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line (ECO D29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jaime Sunye Neto vs Adam Kuligowski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.