Damir Sulc vs Gyozo Pataki
2011 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (B66).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Damir Sulc vs Gyozo Pataki with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Damir Sulc (2251)
- Black
- Gyozo Pataki (2354)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (B66)
About this chess game
This chess game between Damir Sulc (2251) and Gyozo Pataki (2354) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (B66). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Damir Sulc games or Gyozo Pataki games? This Damir Sulc vs Gyozo Pataki encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Damir Sulc vs Gyozo Pataki?
Damir Sulc vs Gyozo Pataki (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Damir Sulc vs Gyozo Pataki?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (ECO B66).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Damir Sulc vs Gyozo Pataki, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.